Legal Opinion
Ross v. Omnibusch, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided November 9, 1984No. K 84-72PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, District Judge.
On October 22, 1984, the Court ruled from the Bench concerning several bases for dismissal or transfer raised by the Defendants in their Motion to Dismiss and their reply to Plaintiffs’ response. The Court reserved for written Opinion those grounds Defendants assert in their motion for dismissing Count 7 of Plaintiffs’ Complaint. This Opinion now addresses those grounds.
Count 7 alleges a violation of the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968. In their Motion to Dismiss, filed May 7, 1984, and their reply memorandum…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- MHC, Inc. v. International Union, United Mine WorkersDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1988
- Guidry v. Bank of LaPlaceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1990
- Bale v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- Omega Const. Co., Inc. v. AltmanDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1987
- Al-Kazemi v. General Acceptance & Investment Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.