Legal Opinion

Noble v. National American Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 2, 1979No. 1 CA-CIV 4006PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WREN, Presiding Judge.

The question raised by this appeal is whether Arizona recognizes a cause of action in tort for a bad faith refusal of an insurer to pay a claim of its own insured. We find that such a cause of action does exist in this state.

In return for a monthly premium of $26.50, appellee, National American Life Insurance Company, issued to appellant, Rosemarie Noble, a policy of health insurance insuring her against surgical and hospital expenses arising from any sickness originating after March 28, 1974. In January of 1975 appellant had surgery for endometriosis resulting in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Lawton v. Great Southwest Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Noble v. National American Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Casson v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1982
  3. Silva v. Albuquerque Assembly & Distribution Freeport Warehouse Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Noble v. National American Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Peterson v. 21st Century Centennial Insurance Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API