Legal Opinion

Croston v. Department of Veterans Affairs

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided October 7, 2025No. 5:24-cv-00633Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA SARAH CROSTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-24-00633-JD ) SARAH BRESHEARS, in her ) individual capacity, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Sarah Croston’s motion to strike certain affirmative defenses, (“Pl.’s Mot. Strike”) [Doc. No. 21], from Defendant Breshears’s answer, (“Def.’s Answer Pl.’s Am. Compl.”) [Doc. No. 17], under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). The Court has considered the parties’ submissions and the relevant law. See [Doc. Nos. 17, 21, 23, 24]. For the following reasons,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Sales, Inc. v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API