Croston v. Department of Veterans Affairs
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA SARAH CROSTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-24-00633-JD ) SARAH BRESHEARS, in her ) individual capacity, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Sarah Croston’s motion to strike certain affirmative defenses, (“Pl.’s Mot. Strike”) [Doc. No. 21], from Defendant Breshears’s answer, (“Def.’s Answer Pl.’s Am. Compl.”) [Doc. No. 17], under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). The Court has considered the parties’ submissions and the relevant law. See [Doc. Nos. 17, 21, 23, 24]. For the following reasons,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Sales, Inc. v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.