Legal Opinion

Blount v. Smith

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1967No. 40530PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchneider, J.

From February 1, 1957, 1o November 14, 1961, Dr. Henry C. Blount, Jr., the plaintiff-appellee here, was engaged in the practice of medicine in Marion, Ohio, as a “partner” in the Frederick C. Smith Clinic. The eleven defendants (six of whom are appellants here) are also physicians and *42were all of the other members of the Clinic from February 1, 1961, to November 14, 1961.

During the latter period, the business of the Clinic was governed by a written “Articles of Copartnership,” in which “net partnership income” is defined as all amounts collected by the Clinic for professional services…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sheehy v. Seilon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Nottingdale Homeowners' Ass'n v. DarbyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lake Ridge Academy v. CarneyOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In Re: Graham Square, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. Jones v. U-Haul Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
  5. Mark-It Place Foods, Inc. v. New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API