Legal Opinion
Nestle Ice Cream Co. v. Fuller
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 5, 1996No. 1 CA-CV 95-0315PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Judge.
Defendants-Appellants Walter Fuller and Christ M. Rousseff (defendants) owned a piece of real property located in Maricopa County, Arizona, which they pledged in May of 1993 as security for a debt in the amount of $800,182.00 owed by Dixie Ice Cream, Inc. (Dixie) to Plaintiff-Appellee Nestlé Ice Cream Company (Nestlé), as evidenced by a promissory note (note 2). The note was to be repaid by Dixie over an eleven-month period. The defendants had no personal liability for the debt, but they signed deeds of trust giving Nestlé the right to foreclose on their real property…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Norene R. O'Dell v. United States of America and Jack Ruhter, Trustee in BankruptcyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- HCZ Construction Inc. v. First Franklin Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Pleak v. Entrada Property Owners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Tenet Healthsystem TGH, Inc. v. SilverCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Jeffries v. HassellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Bank One, Arizona, N.A. v. BeauvaisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.