Legal Opinion

Wineinger v. Bear Brand Ranch

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 23, 1988No. G004445PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUESEBRINK, J.*

Ken Wineinger, age 17, was one of two passengers in a Toyota Land Cruiser being driven by another 17 year old, defendant and respondent Eric Goodman, when the vehicle careened over a cliff in a residential housing tract. Wineinger was killed. The tract was then being *1006developed by Bear Brand Ranch and O. Hill Co., the owners and general contractors. Parrott & Wright Construction Co. was the grading and paving contractor responsible for completion of the streets.

Wineinger’s heirs were awarded a $638,504 judgment in the ensuing wrongful death action. The jury determined…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lemons v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Delta Farms Reclamation District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Gibson v. KeithSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  4. Georgia Power Company v. McGruderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  5. Parish v. LloydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ornelas v. RandolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Alfred L. Mansion v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Valladares v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Myers v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Ornelas v. RandolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API