Legal Opinion

Lett v. Smith

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1926No. 2591PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebb, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiffs, Dr. F. M. Lett, and the representatives of Dr. Hardy, against W. Heine Smith to recover for professional services rendered to defendant's wife, Mrs. Z. L. Smith.

We might say that this action is the sequel of the action of W. Heine Smith versus Drs. Lett and Hardy, No. 2191 on the docket of this court, and this day decided, in that the present action was filed subsequent to the action referred to, and in that the plaintiff’s demands are based upon charges made for services rendered in the treatment in which the ¡physicians were charged with malpractice…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hunter v. BurroughsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  2. Wilson v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Shockley v. TuckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Jones v. Tri-State Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. George v. ShannonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Meyer v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. King v. DittoOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Wells v. McGeheeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Berg v. WillettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Mournet v. SumnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API