FALCI v. United States
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY VINCENTP.FALCL =——ss—SSC: Petitioner, Civ. No. 20-8962 (RK) v . UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OPINION Respondent. KIRSCH, District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct his Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See ECF No. 1. In his Motion, Petitioner initially proceeded pro se, and asserted two claims: Claim I, Petitioner stated his criminal defense trial counsel (“Trial Counsel”) was ineffective by failing to advise him of the elements of the charged offense required for conviction; and Claim…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.