State v. Baker
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION OF
KOBAYASHI. J.
I would reverse and acquit defendant. Even a cursory reading of Section 852 of the Hawaii Penal Code,1 which provides in relevant part:(1) A person commits the offense of forgery in the second degree if, with intent to defraud, he falsely makes, completes, or alters a written instrument, or utters a forged instrument . . . ,
makes it clear that the defendant was unlawfully convicted. The indictment charged the defendant, to-wit: . . did,
with intent to defraud, falsely complete and utter a written instrument” (emphasis added). The indictment does not charge the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Heath v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Territory v. BurnsHawaii Supreme Court · 1923
- Territory v. MiyamotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1927