Heath v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Heath was convicted in the United States District Court of Hawaii of wilfully converting and selling property of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 641. The sole question presented for our determination is whether or not the Government owned the property at the time it is alleged to have been converted and sold.
We have a sketchy record before us but it does disclose the following pertinent facts. On August 29, 1950, the Federal Supply Service, General Service Administration, hereafter the Government, entered into a written contract with the Hugo Neu…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Peterson v. Universal Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- Rossi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
- Edelstone v. SchimmelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Rudy-Patrick Seed Co. v. RosemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- Pacific Electric Ry. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. DaigleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957
- Glacy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
- George F. Glacy v. United States of America, Daniel A. Benson v. United States of America, Henry Mersey v. United States of America, Patrick B. McGinnis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
- State v. BakerHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. BakerHawaii Supreme Court · 1974