Legal Opinion

Tyer v. Hines

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 27, 1941No. 7612PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

VINSON, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal from the action of the District Court dismissing plaintiff’s prayer for a writ of mandamus that would compel Frank T. Hines, Administrator of Veterans’ Affairs, to make payments under an alleged policy of War Risk yearly renewable term insurance. Section 19 of the World War Veterans’ Act 1924, as amended, 38 U.S.C.A. § 445, provides the exclusive judicial remedy for such a claim. The fact that suit under this section, as plaintiff states, was barred by its own statute of limitations, does not make the remedy any less exclusive.

The plaintiff urges…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hines v. United States Ex Rel. MarshCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. United States ex rel. Lyons v. HinesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  3. Morgan v. HinesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lufkin v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API