Legal Opinion

Exxon Corp. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided October 31, 1995No. Civ. A. 94-2111PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

JONES, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is “Exxon Corporation’s Motion to Review Order of Magistrate Judge,” which was submitted on a previous date without oral argument. Having reviewed the memoranda of the parties, the record and the applicable law, the Court DENIES the motion of Exxon Corporation.

Background

Exxon Corporation (hereinafter “Exxon”) filed suit seeking declaratory judgment that a “Settlement Agreement” allegedly entered into with St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company (hereinafter “St. Paul”) does not contain a limit of $500,000 on sums owed by St.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Succession of Smith v. Kavanaugh, Pierson & TalleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  2. Lehmann v. American Southern Home Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. United States of America, and Eugene Nepveaux, Revenue Officer of Internal Revenue v. Thomas A. Moore, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. In Re Shell Oil RefineryDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Conoco Inc. v. Boh Bros. Construction Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1998
  2. Dixie Mill Supply Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1996
  3. Royal Surplus Lines Insurance v. Sofamor Danek Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999
  4. Homeland Insurance Company of New York v. Clinical Pathology Laboratories, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2022
  5. Rigid Constructors L L C v. Mitsui Sumitomo Marine Management U S A IncDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API