Legal Opinion

Finfinger v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 15, 2004PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge KELLEY.

Roger C. Finfinger (Claimant) appeals pro se from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which affirmed an order of a Referee denying Claimant benefits under the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1987) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §§ 751-914. We affirm.

Claimant worked for Alta Telecom, Inc. (Employer) from January 5, 2001, through September 8, 2001, as a light wave test technician. Although Claimant accepted Employer’s offer of employment from his home in Pennsylvania, Claimant worked in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kirkwood v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Daly v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Richards v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. A. Boff v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. B. Key v. PA DOCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. G. Chinniah v. N. ForresterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. G.M. Martinez v. City of Reading Police Dept.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API