Legal Opinion
Grand Lodge Knights of Pythias v. Massey
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 26, 1926No. 16520PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. Where the defendant is described in a petition as “the Grand Lodge, Knights of Pythias of Georgia, under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias of N. A., S. A., B., A., A., and A.,” a process attached which is directed to “the defendant, Grand Lodge of Knights Pythias of Georgia,” is directed to the defendant named in the petition and is not void as being directed to a different person. If the process is defective, it is not for this reason invalid, as such defect is curable by amendment. Civil Code (1910), § 5709; Baldwin, Starr & Co. v. McMichael, 68 Ga. 828; Smith v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Springfield Fire Insurance v. PriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- McKnight v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Williams v. Atlanta National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Maund v. KeatingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Perry v. TumlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Operative Plasterers' & Cement Finishers' International Ass'n v. CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. AgnewMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
- Rhodes v. Southern Flour & Grain Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- McFarland v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939