Legal Opinion

Provident Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Fifth-Third Union Trust Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, PJ.

The trial court based its judgment for the Provident Savings Bank, defendant in that court, upon the limitation of action contained in §11325-1, GC. This section does not apply to the duty of depositors as to indorsements. •

■ The duty of a depositor to know its own signature is entirely different from the duty of such depositor as to an indorsement. The depositor has a right to rely upon the implied guaranty of the bank that it has paid to the payee, just as the drawee bank has a right to rely upon the guaranty of the paying bank, unless in any case the acts of the parties amount to…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Twellman v. Lindell Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Commercial Credit Corporation, a Corporation v. Empire Trust Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  3. National Surety Corp. v. City Bank & Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State Planters Bank & Tr Co. of Richmond, VA v. Fifth-Third Union Tr Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Commercial Credit Corp. v. Empire Trust Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API