Legal Opinion

Purolator Courier Corp. v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 1, 1979No. 77-1974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion PER CURIAM.

2Per curiam

Petitioners, Purolator Courier Corp. and Central Delivery Service, challenge a decision of the ICC expanding the “terminal area” within which bus operators may pick up and deliver “express” shipments (a term that generally refers to transport of small packages.)1 Petitioners argue that § 208(d) of the Act2 permits a bus operator to pick up and deliver express only in vehicles that carry passengers. Alternatively, petitioners suggest that even if the bus operator may *308use a vehicle that carries no passengers, the ICC could not permit a larger terminal area for express (the…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Freight Forwarders Inst. v. United States, ICCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
  3. Short Haul Survival Committee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jack O. Black v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  2. Purolator Courier Corporation v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API