Legal Opinion

McChesney v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Orrin N. Carter, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ricks

This is an appeal from a judgment of the county court of Cook county confirming a special assessment against appellants’ property for paving Vernon avenue, Sixty-fourth, Sixty-fifth and Sixty-sixth streets, in the city of Chicago, with crushed limestone and granite top dressing.

It is objected by appellants that the ordinance contravenes the act of 1901, in that it provides that the cost of making and collecting the assessment shall be paid by special assessment. The proceedings were instituted prior to the date that act took effect, and judgment was entered on June 13, 1901,—more than a month…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northern Pacific Railroad v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Gage v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Gage v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Field v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Belleville v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Bickerdike v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  3. McChesney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Guire v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API