Legal Opinion

McChesney v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the County Court,of Cook county- the Hon. Frank Harry, Judge, presiding. ■

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

This case was here on a former appeal, when it was decided that the judgment of confirmation of a special assessment, entered after the act took effect, by which it was provided that the cost of making and collecting such assessment should be paid by the city out of its general funds, was erroneous in including such cost. (McChesney v. City of Chicago, 201 Ill. 344.) For that error the cause was remanded to the county court, and, being re-instated there, appellants filed additional objections, alleging that the ordinance for the improvement was void because it contained a provision that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. NodeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Gage v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Dobler v. Village of WarrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. McChesney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Thompson v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. People ex rel. HanbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. City of Chicago v. JeromeIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Gage v. People ex rel. HanbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. McLennan v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Bransfield v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API