Legal Opinion
State v. Ross
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 14, 2018No. Case No. 18-cv-01865-RS; 18-cv-02279-RSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD SEEBORG, United States District Judge *752I. INTRODUCTION
This action, comprising two related cases, arises from the U.S. Census Bureau's decision to include a question regarding citizenship status on the 2020 decennial census questionnaire. The plaintiffs in these two related cases contend the decision to include this question violated the Constitution and the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA"). Plaintiffs in Case No. 18-cv-1865 are the State of California, the County of Los Angeles, the City of Los Angeles, the City of Fremont, the City of Long Beach, the City of Oakland, the City of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Defense of Animals v. Sanderson Farms, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Stiner v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024