Legal Opinion

Stiner v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 26, 2024No. 4:17-cv-03962Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 STACIA STINER, et al., Case No. 17-cv-03962-HSG 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY 9 v. JUDGMENT AS TO THE BROOKHURST SUBCLASS’ ACCESS 10 BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, INC., et BARRIER CLAIMS al., 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 856, 984, 985 Defendants. 12 13 In its Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Cross-Motions for Summary 14 Judgment (“Summary Judgment Order”), the Court deferred ruling on Plaintiffs’ motion for partial 15 summary judgment as to Plaintiffs’ access barrier claims. Dkt. No. 978;…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  4. Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Alejandro Rodriguez v. James HayesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API