Legal Opinion · Dissent

Neiswonger v. Janics

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 13, 1990No. A90A0569Published

1DissentSognier, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

Appellant, the investigating officer, and the eyewitness who had been traveling behind appellant all testified that the collision occurred on Colerain Road, a two-lane road. Their testimony and the photographs taken by the officer at the scene established that the collision occurred in the right lane of that road. Both appellant and the eyewitness testified that appellee was driving slowly in a wavering manner, and that he stopped in the travel lane and began to turn in front of appellant, who applied her brakes, leaving a 105 foot skid *611mark. Appellee did not simply…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Layton v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Veal v. FraserCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Bufford v. BuffordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API