Layton v. Knight
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff in a personal injury action appeals from the granting of a summary judgment to the defendant. (We shall refer to the parties as plaintiff and defendant for clarity because, while their designation below was reversed, this is their actual status in the counterclaim which is the only action being litigated).
1. Plaintiffs basic contention is that the facts, though essentially undisputed, still leave room for inferences favorable to the plaintiff which, especially in a negligence case, should be considered by the jury.
There are three issues which plaintiff contends…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McCarty v. National Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Minnick v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Goldstein v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lewis v. Harry White Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance v. HeuleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Tallman Pools of Georgia, Inc. v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Wood v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Evans v. BatchelorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.