Legal Opinion
In Re Lloyds of Texas
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided September 18, 1930No. 2956PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ATWELL, District Judge.
Under the terms of articles 5017, 5017e, statutes of Texas (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St.) insurance organizations operated under Lloyds plan are required to maintain certain assets and eez’tain guaranteed funds; upon failure to make good any impairment the insurance commissioner is required to take charge of such assets, and, if possible, to effect reinsurance, and, in case reinsurance cannot be had, the affairs of such Lloyds shall be wouzzd up through a receivership instituted by the board.
Sometime early in 1980 the insurance commissioner discovered that Lloyds of Texas did…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Burk-Waggoner Oil Assn. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Vadakin v. CassCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
- In Re Minnesota Ins. UnderwritersDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1929
- In re Hercules Atkin Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Crum & Forster, Inc. v. Monsanto Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994
- Pope & Cottle Co. v. Fairbanks Realty TrustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
- Forman v. IrbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- In Re Poland UnionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- In re International Underwriters, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.