City of Casper v. Haines
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Chief Justice.
In these consolidated cases, the City of Casper and the State of Wyoming’s Worker’s Compensation Division seek review of the district court’s order affirming the decision granting worker compensation benefits to ap- pellee James Haines. Appellants’ major contention is that the statute of limitations bars appellee’s award of benefits. Wyo.Stat. § 27-12-503(a) (1977). 1 Appellants also contest findings that an untimely report was excusable and the injury' occurred in the course of employment.
Based upon our decision in Aanenson v. State ex rel. Worker’s Comp., 842 P.2d…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baldwin v. ScullionWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
- Aanenson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Bemis v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1965
- Big Horn Coal Company v. WartenslebenWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wesaw v. Quality MaintenanceWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Yenne-Tully v. Workers' Safety & Compensation Division, Department of EmploymentWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Butts v. Wyoming State Board of ArchitectsWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Wright v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Stevens v. State Ex Rel. Department of Workforce Services, Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.