Legal Opinion

Hartford v. Connecticut Natural Gas Corporation

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 7, 1973No. File No. 107679PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appeal herein by the plaintiff city of Hartford is prosecuted from an order of the defendant public utilities commission, hereinafter referred to as PUC, granting an interim rate increase to the defendant Connecticut Natural Gas Corporation, hereinafter referred to as CNG. CNG is a public service company, franchised by the PUC to provide gas services, at rates and charges regulated by the PUC, within its assigned territory in the state of Connecticut.

I

The sequence of events is as follows. On July 20, 1972, CNG filed with the PUC an amendment of its existing rate schedule, effective August…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. VroomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  2. Florentine v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  3. Watson v. HowardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  4. East Side Civic Assn. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  5. McNish v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Mound Bayou v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Marshall v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Prospect Gardens Convalescent Home v. NorwalkConnecticut Superior Court · 1975
  4. Prospect Gardens Convalescent Home, Inc. v. City of NorwalkPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1975
  5. Connecticut Natural Gas Corp. v. Department of Public Utility ControlConnecticut Superior Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API