Legal Opinion
U.S. Bank National Ass'n ND v. Strand
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 19, 2002No. CIV.02-769-STPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart filed Findings and Recommendation (# 27) on September 20, 2002, in the above entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge’s report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Textile Unlimited, Inc., a California Corporation v. A..bmhand Company, Inc., a Georgia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Community State Bank v. StrongCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Bolero v. McCarleyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
- Community State Bank v. StrongCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007