Legal Opinion
Bolero v. McCarley
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided November 19, 2024No. 2:24-cv-01761Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 Bolero, Case No. 2:24-cv-01761-CDS-MDC 5 Plaintiff Order Denying Defendant’s Motion to Reopen Case and Request for 6 v. Hearing, and Striking Rogue Filings 7 Amanda McCarley, [ECF Nos. 18, 19, 20, 21] 8 Defendant 9 10 Pro se defendant Amanda McCarley filed a motion to reopen this case (ECF No. 18), 11 which I construe as a motion for reconsideration of my order remanding this action to Las Vegas 12 Justice Court (ECF No. 17).1 The same day, McCarley filed a second application to proceed in 13 forma pauperis (IFP) (ECF No. 19), a notice…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Carroll v. NakataniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Melvin A. McCabe and Mark H. Madsen v. Arvon J. Arave, Warden, Idaho State Penitentiary Al Murphy, Director, Idaho State Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Elmore v. Cone Mills Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Frasure v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.