Legal Opinion
Prudential Insurance v. Bliss
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided July 19, 1932No. 28031PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.
This cause is before the court on motion for rehearing, orally argued, and will be treated as though a rehearing had been formally allowed. The former opinion is reported in 122 Neb. 561, reference to which is made for a statement of the facts.
Grave doubts have arisen as to the soundness of the principles announced in our former opinion, as well as those announced in Wells v. Farmers State Bank, 121 Neb. 462, and Wells v. Farmers State Bank, 121 Neb. 466. For that reason it is deemed proper to reexamine the questions there considered.
Foreclosure of a real estate mortgage can only be had in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Compton v. JesupCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Armstrong v. MayerNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
- Leigh v. GreenNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- Southern Hardware & Supply Co. v. LesterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Terrell v. CheathamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- SALINE STATE BANK, Appellant, v. Richard MAHLOCH, Eunice Mahloch, Dennis Mahloch and First National Bank of Chicago, Illinois, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. VictorNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Hoover v. HallerNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
- In Re AndersonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1985
- Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. GanserNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.