Passantino v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed.
Upon our review of the facts in this record, as set forth in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Cohalan at the Appellate Division, it is apparent that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case at trial. There was no showing of negligence or lack of due care on the part of the defendant board of education. Therefore, the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, made at the end of the entire case, should have been granted.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Benitez v. New York City Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Hauser v. North Rockland Central School District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Maddox v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Totan v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Nauta v. City of Poughkeepsie, NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.