Legal Opinion

Eidsvik v. Foley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 14, 1906No. Nos. 14,933—(80)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeals by defendants from orders of the district court for Polk county, Watts, J., overruling their demurrers to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

Appeals from orders of the district court of the county of Polk overruling the defendants’ demurrers to the complaint in an action on a ditch contractor’s bond.

The board of county commissioners of the county of Polk established and ordered to be constructed a public ditch, and on August 7, 1903, let the contract for the execution of the work and its completion on or before July 1, 1904, to the defendant John B. Foley. The report of the engineer upon which the ditch was established and his plans, specifications, and directions therein contained were made a part of the contract. The contractor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jordan v. KavanaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  2. Breen v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Park Bros. & Co. v. SykesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  4. Benson v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Standard Salt & Cement Co. v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Grams v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Caldwell v. CarrollSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API