Legal Opinion

Mehan v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 2, 1991No. 1 CA-IC 90-090Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Judge.

The issue presented in this review of an Industrial Commission award is whether a claimant, who had only a discretionary possibility of litigating a causal relationship in a prior proceeding, is precluded in a subsequent proceeding on reopening from seeking a determination of that relationship.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 1981, petitioner employee (claimant) injured his right knee at work, and the respondent carrier (Fidelity) accepted com-pensability. This injury eventually necessitated a below knee amputation of the right leg. The claim was initially closed in May…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Phoenix Cotton Pickery v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  2. Red Bluff Mines, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  3. Sun Control Tile Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  4. Van Sickle v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. Blickenstaff v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API