Legal Opinion

DiPalma v. Seldman

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1994No. B070213PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Plaintiff and appellant Benito DiPalma (DiPalma) appeals a judgment following a grant of nonsuit in favor of defendants and respondents Norman Seldman (Seldman) and Garcia & Seldman, Inc., a professional corporation (Garcia & Seldman) (sometimes collectively referred to as Seldman).

The essential issue presented is whether the trial court properly granted nonsuit in this legal malpractice action on the ground DiPalma failed to show the judgment in the underlying case was collectible.

A plaintiff who establishes legal malpractice in prosecuting a claim must also prove careful…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Smith v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Campbell v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kituskie v. CorbmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Williams v. WraxallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Carbone v. TierneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  5. Kituskie v. CorbmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API