Bacus v. Palo Verde Unified School District Board of Education
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
TIMLIN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs’motion for a preliminary injunction (“Motion”) was submitted for decision; The court, the Honorable Robert J. Timlin, has read and considered the complaint, the moving, opposing and reply papers, as well as any admissible evidence. Based on such consideration, the court concludes as follows:
I
Procedural Background
Plaintiff Connie H. Bacus (“Bacus”) and Floyd. Brosman (“Brosman”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed the instant action seeking injunctive and declaratory relief against the Palo Verde…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lee v. WeismanSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Marsh v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sierra On-Line, Inc. v. Phoenix Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Snyder v. Murray City Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Sanders v. City of MontgomeryDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004
- Hinrichs v. BosmaDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2005
- Rubin v. City of LancasterDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Johnson v. Costco Wholesale CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.