Legal Opinion

Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. Tennessee Mill Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM FRANKLIN. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Franklin County.— Hon. R. W. Smartt, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green

delivered, the opinion of the Court.

This suit was brought by the complainant railway company to recover balance of freight charges due from defendant R. J. Riddle. Defendant interposed the statute of limitations to most of the demand and also filed a cross-*239bill seeking to offset claims of his against the railway company for overcharges and for loss and damage to shipments.

The chancellor gave to the complainant a decree for the balance of freight charges due it, overruled the defendant’s plea of the statute of limitations, and held that defendant was not entitled, to offset Ms claims against…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Hocking Valley Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  3. Sampson v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Wells Fargo & Co. v. CuneoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917
  5. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. William S. Stein Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. LindellSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. BaxterTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Doughty v. HammondTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Fullerton Lumber Co. v. Chicago, M., S. P. &. P. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  5. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. South Carolina Produce Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API