Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Amana Global Company v. King County Flood Control Zone District

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided April 6, 2023No. 2:22-cv-01626Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 AMANA GLOBAL COMPANY, et CASE NO. C22-1626JLR al., 11 ORDER Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 KING COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL ZONE DISTRICT, et al., 14 15 Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 Before the court are pro se Plaintiffs Amana Global Company (“Amana”) and 18 Hafid Tahraoui’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”1) motions for (1) an extension of time to file a 19 // 20 // 21 22 1 Mr. Tahraoui is the owner of Amana, a sole proprietorship. (Compl. (Dkt. # 1) ¶¶ 1-2.) 1 response in opposition to Defendants’2 motions to dismiss…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. John C. McGuckin v. Dr. Smith John C. Medlen, Dr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API