Legal Opinion

Roberts v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 18, 1986No. 86-3Published

1Per curiam

Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that appellant is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. Smith v. State, 445 So.2d 323 (Fla.1983); Runyon v. State, 460 So.2d 494 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Whitchard v. State, 459 So.2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Rosemond v. State, 433 So.2d 635 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Snow v. State, 399 So.2d 466…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Whitchard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Rosemond v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Snow v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Runyon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API