Legal Opinion
Rosemond v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 23, 1983No. AS-194PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
433 So.2d 635 (1983)
Eddie Lee ROSEMOND, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. AS-194.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
June 23, 1983.
Eddie Lee Rosemond, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.
MILLS, Judge.
Rosemond appeals the summary denial of his petition for Rule 3.850 postconviction relief. We affirm.
Rosemond pled guilty to three counts of conspiracy to sell cocaine. He now argues that his plea was not made with full understanding and that his counsel was inadequate because he wasn't advised of the potential for subsequent treatment as a habitual felon. Any enhancement of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Graham v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Eutsey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Epps v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Byrd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kilgore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- Bates v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Blackshear v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Comer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Abraham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.