Legal Opinion
Carr v. United States Sugar Corp.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 17, 1962No. 31220PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES R. SCOTT, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner, Christopher Carr filed a claim for compensation and the deputy commissioner made an award to claimant based upon a stipulation of facts between the claimant and his employer — respondent United States Sugar Corporation.
The full commission denied compensation and reversed the deputy commissioner’s finding by a two to one decision. The claimant has petitioned this Court to review by certiorari the order of the Commission.
The stipulated facts are set forth in the findings of fact of the deputy commissioner as follows:
“That on November 27, 1959, in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Myers v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- John H. Kaiser Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Guiliano v. Daniel O'Connell's SonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Dupree v. BarneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pierre v. Seaside Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Frank Diehl Farms v. Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Grenon v. City of Palm Harbor Fire Dist.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Mecca Farms, Inc. v. EspinoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Atkinson v. Florida Sugar Corp., Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Palm Beach County1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.