Legal Opinion

Mecca Farms, Inc. v. Espino

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 10, 1982No. AE-402PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WENTWORTH, Judge.

The employer/carrier appeal an order of the deputy commissioner finding the claimant’s accident compensable, based on the “bunk-house rule.” We affirm.

Claimant was a migrant worker, working for appellant/Mecca Farms, when he was shot by co-residents of the migrant camp where he was living. The incident occurred at approximately 3:40 a. m. when claimant discovered two men attempting to steal his food. Claimant and his assailants were all residents of a migrant camp in which Mecca’s employee, Benito Rodriguez, leased houses. Rodriguez rented some of the leased buildings to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dupree v. BarneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Wilson Cypress Company v. MillerSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  3. Carr v. United States Sugar Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones v. Halliburton Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. Jones v. Halliburton Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
  3. Littles v. Osceola Farms Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Jones v. Halliburton Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API