DiCamillo v. Clomiro
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtSpeziale, J.
The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment of the Superior Court sustaining the defendants’ pleas in abatement to the plaintiffs’ action for injunctive relief and damages.
The background of the plaintiffs’ action is as follows: The individual defendants, Vincent Clomiro, Kenneth Catandella, Robert Walsh, and Anthony Copertino, Jr., filed an application for a variance with the defendant zoning board of appeals of Bridgeport. The first newspaper notice of the application appeared on December 2, 1974. The second notice appeared on December 9, 1974. A public hearing on the application was held…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Treat v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Lunt v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
3Cited by6 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Moscowitz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Garden Mutual Benefit Assn. v. LevyConnecticut Superior Court · 1981
- Cretaro v. Equitec Real Estate Investors Fund XIIConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Lewis v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.