United States v. Scoblick
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WATSON, Chief Judge.
The defendants found guilty by verdict of a jury on five counts of aiding and abetting in wilful misapplications of moneys, funds, and credits of the May-field State Bank, Mayfield, Pennsylvania, 18 U.S.C.A. § 656, on twenty-three counts of aiding and abetting in making false entries in the books and records of said bank, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1005, 1 on one count of conspiracy to commit offenses against the United States of America, 18 U.S. C.A. § 371, and on thirty-five counts of violating the mail fraud statute, 18 U.S. C.A. § 1341, move for judgment of acquittal 2 and in the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Kann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. SheridanSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,910 United States of America v. Harold Erickson and Francis WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- United States v. James Paul Scoblick, Frank Scoblick, and Scoblick Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Clarence Orville Stevens v. Unisted States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. Donald BarclayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.