Legal Opinion

Los Angeles County Bar Ass'n v. Eu

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 30, 1992No. 91-55876PublishedCited by 159 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

The Los Angeles County Bar Association challenges the constitutionality of a California statute which prescribes the number of judges on the Superior Court for Los Angeles County. The Bar Association asserts that a shortage of state court judges causes inordinate delays in civil litigation, depriving litigants of access to the courts. The Bar Association also claims the statute denies local litigants equal protection of the laws because it forces them to suffer longer delays than litigants in neighboring counties. The federal district court granted summary judgment…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by159 opinions

  1. Association Des Eleveurs De Canards Et D'Oies Du Quebec v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Courthouse News Service v. Michael PlanetCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Planned Parenthood of Idaho, Inc. v. WasdenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Peabody Western Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. SKS & Associates, Inc. v. DartCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API