Legal Opinion

Minerva Automobiles, Inc. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 7, 1938No. Customs Appeal 4057PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAND, Acting Presiding Judge.

Appellant has here appealed from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, Third Division, which overruled the protest of appellant against the assessment by the Collector of Customs at the port of Los Angeles of countervailing duty under paragraph 369 of the Tariff Act of 1922, § 1, 42 Stat. 858, 885, amounting to' 960 Belgian francs per 100 kilos upon an automobile imported from Belgium. Appellant claims that the automobile should have been assessed with the normal duties under the aforesaid paragraph in view of the most-favored-nation clause contained…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Whitney v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Chew Heong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. The Cherokee TobaccoSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  5. Frost v. WenieSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Farr Man and Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
  2. John T. Bill Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API