Legal Opinion
Silvernail v. Kent, County of
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 22, 2004No. 03-1413PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J., joined by Norris, J.,
COLE, J. (pp. 605-09), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
*603OPINION
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
Michele Silvernail and Sarah Paquin-Dodge appeal the district court’s dismissal of their complaint alleging that the bad check collection scheme utilized by Kent County (“the County”) violated their due process rights under the United States and Michigan Constitutions. Because the challenged process was constitutionally sufficient, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
Plaintiffs wrote bad checks to merchants in Kent County. Under municipal ordinances, a $25 fee is assessed for the passing of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Kevin W. Ziegler v. Ibp Hog Market, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- William Gardner v. Jason EvansCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Gradisher v. County of MuskegonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Firefighters United for Fairness v. City of MemphisDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2005
- David Shoemaker v. City of HowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- David Shoemaker v. City of HowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.