Legal Opinion
Ford Bros. v. Eddington Distilling Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 25, 1939No. 211PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATSON, District Judge.
This case is before the court for determination of motions to dismiss the complaint.
The plaintiff and the defendants, with the exception of the United States of America, are residents of the Commonwealth of. Pennsylvania.' This action was brought for the purpose of terminating a consent agreement between the plaintiff and the Eddington. Distilling Company, which provided that certain tax liens of the United States would be given preference over the lien of the plaintiff on various machines in the Eddington .Distilling Company plant. The complaint alleges that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Admiral Oriental Line v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- United States v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Integrity Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1933
3Cited by5 opinions
- John P. King v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Kennedy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Miners Sav. Bank of Pittston, Pa. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
- Alberio v. HamptonDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1977
- Sumter v. SheffieldDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1952