Snear v. Eiserloh
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Janvier, J... Plaintiff has appealed' fro;m d. ⅛⅞⅛⅛⅛¾ rejecting his demand for. cjDmpénsátibn under the Employers’ Liability ¿ay?s.(Act ⅝0.,20'⅛ 1914 .as amended). , He ¿s'sé.rts (that''dtifing the course,of his employment there"occurreff an accidenp-which arose °⅜-°¾ the work, ¾⅞ that inthe accident hi*; Sustained injuries‘to his hand which temporarily totally d^ablécj him. f'- ._ 1
Defendant admits the employment and the occurrence of the accident, but denies that liability resulted, basing its denial on the following grounds:
First, that even if it be conceded that plaintiff had been…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kern v. Southport Mill, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Pierre v. BarringerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
- Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- Prevost v. Gheens Realty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Plick v. Toye Bros. Auto & Taxicab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- O'CONNOR v. American Mutual Liability Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
- Viator v. New Hotel Monteleone, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- Adams v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
- Hecker v. BetzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Allen v. YantisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.