Legal Opinion

Snear v. Eiserloh

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1932No. 14180PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Janvier, J... Plaintiff has appealed' fro;m d. ⅛⅞⅛⅛⅛¾ rejecting his demand for. cjDmpénsátibn under the Employers’ Liability ¿ay?s.(Act ⅝0.,20'⅛ 1914 .as amended). , He ¿s'sé.rts (that''dtifing the course,of his employment there"occurreff an accidenp-which arose °⅜-°¾ the work, ¾⅞ that inthe accident hi*; Sustained injuries‘to his hand which temporarily totally d^ablécj him. f'- ._ 1

Defendant admits the employment and the occurrence of the accident, but denies that liability resulted, basing its denial on the following grounds:

First, that even if it be conceded that plaintiff had been…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kern v. Southport Mill, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  2. Pierre v. BarringerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  3. Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  4. Prevost v. Gheens Realty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. Plick v. Toye Bros. Auto & Taxicab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. O'CONNOR v. American Mutual Liability Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Viator v. New Hotel Monteleone, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  3. Adams v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  4. Hecker v. BetzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Allen v. YantisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API