Grimes v. Home Insurance Co. of New York
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
The award made by the appraisers, under the agreement of the parties for the submission of the question of the amount of loss due to collision under the terms of the policy of insurance, was properly held not binding on the plaintiff by reason of the absence of notice and opportunity to be heard. Public Laws 1927, ch. 94, sec. 6; Michie’s Code, 898 (f). It is a well recognized rule that the parties to an arbitration proceeding, independent of statute, have a right to be heard and opportunity to present evidence as to all matters submitted. 3 Am. Jur., 929; 6 C. J., sec. 198. “Notice and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Green Sea Lumber Co. v. PembertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Marshville Cotton Mills, Inc. v. MaslinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Brown v. . BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Waldroup v. . FergusonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tombs v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
- Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. NarronCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002