Legal Opinion

Grimes v. Home Insurance Co. of New York

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The award made by the appraisers, under the agreement of the parties for the submission of the question of the amount of loss due to collision under the terms of the policy of insurance, was properly held not binding on the plaintiff by reason of the absence of notice and opportunity to be heard. Public Laws 1927, ch. 94, sec. 6; Michie’s Code, 898 (f). It is a well recognized rule that the parties to an arbitration proceeding, independent of statute, have a right to be heard and opportunity to present evidence as to all matters submitted. 3 Am. Jur., 929; 6 C. J., sec. 198. “Notice and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Green Sea Lumber Co. v. PembertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Marshville Cotton Mills, Inc. v. MaslinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Brown v. . BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Waldroup v. . FergusonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tombs v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. NarronCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API