Legal Opinion

Perez-Cruet v. Qualcomm Incorporated

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 24, 2024No. 3:23-cv-01890Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 ANTONIO PEREZ-CRUET, ) Case No.: 23-cv-1890-BEN (MMP) ) Plaintiff, 14 ) 15 v. ) ) 16 QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, et al., ) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 17 Defendants. ) DISMISS ) 18 ) 19 ) ) 20 ) 21 ) 22 I. INTRODUCTION 23 Plaintiff is an ex-employee of Qualcomm, Inc., and a current participant in the 24 Qualcomm defined contribution employee pension plan. Defendants manage the pension 25 plan. Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants violated the Employee Retirement Income 26 Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”),

29…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API