Legal Opinion

Rohde v. City of Newport

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 13, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Willis

Reversing.

Newport is a city of the second class operating under the commission form of government. The board of commissioners, in April, 1932, adopted an ordinance to authorize the funding of an indebtedness of $125,-000 evidenced by notes, judgments, and claims against the city. The ordinance was regular in form and strictly in accordance with the statutes regulating the subject-matter. Before the bonds were issued, and on the day before chapter 22 of the Acts of 1932 became effective, R. J. Rohde, a taxpayer of the city, sued to obtain a declaration of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Atkin v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Smith v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Anway v. Grand Rapids Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Randolph v. Shelby CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Akers v. BaldwinKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Shadow v. Rapides Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  4. Cole v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
  5. Hockley v. Carter CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API