In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Borst
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Sponable, S.
The questions involved arise upon a judicial settlement of the accounts of Daisy S. Borst, one of the executors of the last will and testament of Henry V. Borst, deceased.
Daisy S. Borst, as such executrix, has filed an account of her proceedings and two of the sons and legatees, Harry V. Borst and Lauren N. Borst, named in the will of said deceased, have filed objections alleging that said account is erroneous in that such executrix has failed to include therein and to charge herself with twenty-seven shares of the capital stock of the First National Bank of Amsterdam, N. Y., and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ambrosius v. AmbrosiusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Hall v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1916
- In re the Estate of RaleighNew York Surrogate's Court · 1911
3Cited by10 opinions
- Parsons v. LipeNew York Supreme Court · 1933
- In re the Estate of MaijgrenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948
- Cooper v. GossettNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Rosenfield v. Standard Electric Equipment Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1951
- In re the Estate of CrumpNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.